Sunday, April 17, 2011

Will Experiencing Be More Popular Than Understanding Information In Media Glut World?

Will Tomorrow's Market For "Experiencing" Be More Popular Than "Understanding" Considering There Being Too Much Information?

Will we trade away "understanding" digital information for "experiencing" digital information?

Innovating The "Hotel" Concept. 10 Interesting Hotels For World Travelers

The Tourism Industry Is Innovating The "Hotel" Concept. 10 Interesting Hotels For World Travelers In Europe, Etc

More On Interesting Hotel Innovations

USPTO gets new patent bar exam

The USPTO gets new patent bar exam this month. Part of the many changes taking place at the US Patent & Trademark Office.

Friday, April 15, 2011

Cutting Edge Electronic Technology Ambiguity Tolerance Increases Innovative Cutting Edge Electronic Technology Thought Styles

Open mindedness to new futuristic software paradigms increases your futuristic software creative thinking skills. Cutting Edge Electronic Technology studies show one's innovative software idea thinking skills greatly improves when we learn to work with ambiguity. New futuristic software concepts can springboard from new paradigms. Innovative software idea revolutionary ideas wouldn’t be new to us if all program concept parameters were already well laid out. For example, Innovation Institute’s behavior studies 1990 to now (and earlier) show greater levels of futuristic software ambiguity tolerance were found in Nobel prize winners, and electronic inventors.  Likewise, experiencing more cultural mindsets opens our mind to knew possible software idea thought patterns.

How Do Geniuses Think? Common Traits With Cutting Edge Electronic Technology Inventors & Other Gifted Innovators

• Being direct and to the point about futuristic software matters.
• Impatient sometimes when program concept engineers fail to “connect the futuristic software dots”.
• Cutting Edge Electronic Technology inventors take software idea risks.  Cutting Edge Electronic Technology gambling is important.  But too many program concept innovators lack required software idea business risk, and futuristic software market analysis skills.  Most software idea innovators probably lose money.  More broadly, over 99% of inventions that even get to a patent filing, let alone get awarded a patent cover total costs. Innovation Institute lacks specific program concept industry calculations as they would be too difficult to compile.
• Cutting Edge Electronic Technology revolutionary thinkers might process innovative futuristic software ideas faster than others.

Cutting Edge Electronic Technology – Balancing Patience & Listening: How Impatient Cutting Edge Electronic Technology Innovators Communicate Cutting Edge Electronic Technology Ideas.

How Cutting Edge Electronic Technology Inventors Might Adapt Styles Of Communicating About Cutting Edge Electronic Technology Innovations & Cutting Edge Electronic Technology Strategies.
• There are many ways to synergize software idea ideas with other program concept creative thinkers who may think faster or slower than yourself. What communications styles when conveying futuristic software have you found others and yourself practice?
• Bits of program concept info help software idea innovators quickly connect the futuristic software dots:
Others may think program concept innovators didn't catch what was said. Speakers can incorrectly not realize that some gifted listeners process software idea concepts faster than themselves, leading to speakers feeling they are not being fully heard.  Hence futuristic software innovators benefit by practicing patience. Cutting Edge Electronic Technology innovators can also reword and/or even expand upon the speaker’s program concept ideas to help demonstrate the futuristic software innovators has integrated what they heard.  It also helps for program concept innovators to be less possessive about who first thought up the software idea innovative idea, thereby letting other futuristic software engineers feel more appreciated (though there are so many software idea paradigms on such software idea interactions that we can only over simplify at best in this and linked blogs).
• Cutting Edge Electronic Technology inventors might need less program concept data to visualize the big program concept picture:
Cutting Edge Electronic Technology innovators might need less software idea details to put together the big software idea picture. Even when software idea innovators only receive say half the futuristic software details “landmarks to the whole futuristic software picture”, they may be better apt to using past remembered program concept information to compile the big software idea picture.  This program concept compilation from one perspective is just simply integrating futuristic software facets by matching futuristic software patterns being received with recalled software idea patterns. 
• Cutting Edge Electronic Technology idea pattern guessing process: If one possible program concept pattern for guessing what the speaker doesn’t match, another prospective software idea pattern is matched up in the futuristic software inventor’s mind.  In other words, one’s "internal software idea visual analyzer" sorts through related futuristic software concept images, to see what the other has said, and is predicted to say.  It's like steering through software idea virtual reality. This software idea augmented reality can keep shifting as more futuristic software landmarks are identified. Cutting Edge Electronic Technology inventors who may fill in an as yet unstated program concept piece might convince the speaker of many things, hopefully that the software idea innovators “gets the software idea concept”.  This might sometimes work with impatient futuristic software innovators easily bored with what to them appears as routine futuristic software conversation, or software idea though process.
• No software idea communication strategy may even work most of the time when one is stepping outside traditional futuristic software communication protocols “unwritten social norms”. Also when dealing with non common program concept paradigms, the futuristic software innovators will often need to recalibrate program concept interpretations, and not hold onto their old software idea conclusions and/or program concept assumptions they might be drawing to predict what software idea speakers may be sharing.
• There’s so much more. Send us your comments…!

Friday, April 1, 2011

Fukushima Ignored Past Tsunami Wave Height Data?

How Could Fukushima Only Expect A 5.5-Meter Wave? Why Did Fukushima Ignore The 1896 Wave Measuring 38-Meters?

It’s hard to imagine. History shows a 38-meter high wave from a 7.6 quake in 1896. But Fukushi Daiichi’s nuclear plant wasn’t expecting a tsunami over 5.5 meters.  I grew up in Tokyo and find it hard to believe the Japanese could make such a gross miscalculation for a tsunami nuclear safety wall.

Historical Japanese Tsunami Wave Heights:
• 38-meter high wave from  1896’s 7.6 quake.
• 8-meter tsunami in the year 869. The tsunami swept 4 kilometers inland at Sendai Bay south toward Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant.

Guess why the Japanese nuclear power plant 75-kilometers closer to the March 11, 2011 earthquake epicenter got through? Tohoku Electric Power Co.’s Onagawa nuclear power plant was designed 15-meters above sea level.

Does this tsunami nuclear safety wall appear ridiculous?  This came from the Bloomberg link.  Nothing warranted. Nothing in this blog site, or linked blogs sites are guaranteed. All linked blogs and sites are for brainstorming innovation, nuclear safety, or whatever paradigm appears important.

Innovative nuclear safety inventors need more clear answers on Fukushima's tsunami nuclear safety wall.

More limited information on Fukushima Daiichi's tsunami nuclear safety wall's lack of smart safety design.

Innovation Institute, LLC is innovating nuclear safety inventions.  Meanwhile, if anyone has more information, please post it here. To date maybe the web lacks easily obtainable information on the Fukushima tsunami wall design.